Despite an American diplomatic presence for the first time in 30 years, Iran would not yield any ground in its uranium enrichment program.
(this is a surprise?)
So, what does the EU (+1 American) delegation do? Why, give the Iranians more time to reconsider, of course. This was not an ultimatum, mind you, because the delegation did not threaten more sanctions or military action should Iran fail to capitulate.
The U.S. response to Iran’s lack of cooperation hinted at more sanctions. Per State Department Spokesman, Sean McCormack:
“We hope the Iranian people understand that their leaders need to make a choice between cooperation, which would bring benefits to all, and confrontation, which can only led to further isolation [i.e. more sanctions].”
It appears the only ultimatum presented at the meeting came from the man who we thought was only there to listen. When it was his turn to speak, Undersecretary of State, William Burns, delivered a simple message to his Iranian counterpart:
“Iran must suspend uranium enrichment to have negotiations involving the United States.”
Of course, by participating in this meeting the U.S. is negotiating with Iran and Burns statement would be considered a direct one-on-one negotiation. An action the U.S. said it would not undertake.
The Iranian response was definitive (and predictable). According to Keyvan Imani, a member of the Iranian delegation,
“Suspension–there is no chance for that.”
This should come a surprise to no one. This is the first face-to-face meeting between Iran and the U.S. government since the Shah was in power. Had Iran given in to the demands of the delegation it would appear to be due to the American presence and they would lose tremendous face. The result of their rebuff?
Advantage: Iran.
Tags: EU, European Union, Iran, Keyvan Imani, nuclear, Sean McCormack, state department, uranium enrichment, William Burns
[ + ]
3 comments
Comments feed for this article
Trackback link
http://shyspeak.net/2008/07/20/iran-rebuffs-us/trackback/
July 21, 2008 at 9:32 pm
writerchick
Maybe we should send him chocolates and coffee too and then tell him we’ll take them away if he doesn’t stop his uranium enrichment. Criminy.
WC
Why not? We seem to be doing everything else!
- JOS
July 23, 2008 at 4:40 pm
Richard
Well we couldn’t try the OBVIOUS choice? Overthrow those murdering bastards in Tehran? Nah… We’ll just wait for them to destroy Israel and half the Middle East and then wring our hands and say the Israelis had it coming…
Who would have thought that overthrowing genocidal fascist regimes would be an act of imperialism? I must be stupid.
I’m sure many, including those in the Middle East, would like nothing more than the U.S. to take action against Tehran. Of course this would be a secret passion because outwardly we’d be condemned for nation-building, grabbing for oil, etc. so on…
- JOS
July 26, 2008 at 1:41 pm
Eric
Looks like we blinked first in this staring contest.